Skip to main content

Liberals Win. The Mortgage Impact

Liberals likely won't change many mortgage rulesFor young homebuyers wondering what mortgage offerings politicians will gift them post-election, the answer is now clearer.

The Liberal win in Monday’s federal election suggests first-time buyers will likely see a more flexible First-time Home Buyer Incentive (FTHBI). That was the Libs’ key election promise on the housing file.

“We will…increase the qualifying value to nearly $800,000 in the places where houses cost morelike the greater Toronto, Vancouver and Victoria regions,” the party promised. “As market dynamics change in different regions, the program will be adjusted to reflect those realities.”

As reported here last month, giving rookie homebuyers more buying power will drive more uptake. So far, the program has been a dud if one believes anecdotal usage reports from default insurers.

But an upgraded FTHBI is not a lock. “I expect the promised increases to the FTHBI limits in the GTA/GVA will have a 60% chance of becoming a reality,” said Paul Taylor, President and CEO Mortgage Professionals Canada (MPC) on Monday night. “I think Mr. Siddall [CMHC’s CEO] will already be working hard to change the [Prime Minister’s] mind on that.”

Less credit easing

A Liberal minority government also quashes the hopes some had for an easing of the mortgage stress test and re-introduction of 30-year amortizations on insured mortgages. Critics say that limiting such demand-stoking policies is for the best, to ensure the housing market doesn’t rebound too quickly and exacerbate affordability pressures.

Apart from the items mentioned here, “Mortgage policy would likely not be a top priority for [a] minority government, especially when such governments rarely last for longer than two years,” says J.P. Boutros, Director, Government Relations and Regulatory Affairs at MPC.

“In a minority government situation, I believe the only true catalyst for mortgage policy changes would be the unlikely scenario of a rapidly sinking housing marketa shocking and sudden turn for the worseacross Canada.” Barring recession and soaring unemployment, that seems unlikely.

Other likely outcomes

The Liberals have also promised:

  • A new “national tax on vacant residential properties owned by non-Canadians who don’t live in Canada.” The policy aims to limit the housing speculation that can drive up home prices. Taylor called the national foreign ownership vacancy tax a “certainty.”
  • Increasing the Home Buyers’ Plan withdrawal limit from $25,000 to $35,000, providing first-time homebuyers with greater access to their RRSP savings for home purchases. (This was brought in as part of the spring budget announcement.)
  • More negative budgets. Former Finance Minister Bill Morneau promised more deficit spending in one of his victory interviews Monday. That implies interest rates may be slightly higher than they otherwise would be in the next few years, compared to a more conservative/less stimulative fiscal policy.

compare button

6 Comments

  • spader says:

    I’d like to see the Liberals take a page from the Conservatives and push OSFI to exempt those who switch lenders from the stress test. OSFI blew it on that one and someone must hold them accountable.

  • Mike says:

    A 1% vacancy tax on foreigners will do almost nothing to create supply. Leave it to the liberals to tax their way to solutions.

  • skoob says:

    Yay Liberals. Now cut my taxes and stop wasting time on this FTHBI crap.

  • Taxman says:

    NDP in support should push their national foreign buyer tax along with the speculation vacancy tax. Use the money for affordable housing projects.

    Also get the CRA investigating the wealth of these speculators and taxing on worldwide income.

    Then reduce taxes on Canadians that live here. No more free lunch off our backs.

  • Gene says:

    Rrsp for first time home buyers shouldn’t have to be payed back at all then I’d be more incline on using it for a downpayment but i’m not interested in having to pay it back

  • pole1 says:

    You don’t have to pay it back. You can choose to pay taxes on the amount you don’t pay back.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.